Echoing the genetic requisite view of knowledge, raises several points that can be critiqued.

The notion that an object is not given to knowledge but given as a task, echoing the genetic requisite view of knowledge, raises several points that can be critiqued.

Firstly, this notion assumes that knowledge is solely task-oriented and that the only way to acquire knowledge is by actively engaging in a task or problem-solving. While it is true that engaging in tasks and problem-solving can lead to knowledge acquisition, it is not the only way to gain knowledge. Other methods such as observation, experimentation, and reflection also play a significant role in the acquisition of knowledge.

Secondly, this notion implies that the object of knowledge is static and unchanging. However, the nature of knowledge is not fixed, and it can change over time as new information becomes available or as our perspectives shift. Thus, knowledge acquisition is not just a matter of completing a task, but also involves ongoing engagement with the subject matter and a willingness to update one’s understanding based on new information.

Thirdly, this notion suggests that the only way to approach knowledge is through a problem-solving mentality, which can lead to a narrow focus on the immediate task at hand rather than a broader understanding of the subject matter. Knowledge acquisition should involve a holistic approach that considers the broader context in which the object of knowledge exists.

In summary, while the notion that an object is not given to knowledge but given as a task may have some validity in certain contexts, it oversimplifies the complex nature of knowledge acquisition and fails to account for the diverse methods and approaches that can be employed to gain knowledge.