Connect with us


Violence against Women: Inserting Communal Angle



Violence against Women Inserting Communal Angle

Violence against Women: Inserting Communal Angle

– Ram Puniyani
The case of brutal, horrific violence against Shraddha Walkar has shaken the whole nation. It is gruesome and utterly despicable crime. One recalls with similar horror the case of Nirbhaya (Jyoti Singh), the Tandoor case, and the recent one of Abhijit Patidar, who slit the throat of Shilpa in a Jabalpur resort and video graphed it. One also recalls with equal fright when Rahul killed Gulshana in recent times.

In case of Shraddha Walkar since the culprit is Aftab, added angle of love jihad is being inserted by some, into the problem, which young women, involved in interfaith relationship find themselves. Many of these relationships, marriage or ‘living together’ occur against the concurrence of parents or close relatives and friends. They cut off the contact with the defiant girl who is left defenseless in the atmosphere where the patriarchal notions are dominant and some men involved in the relationship take the utter step, leading the condemnable violence, not only in India but all over the world.

The women in such situations are disowned by their families and the communication between the girl and relatives-friends is cut off, leaving the girls more vulnerable. A section of media has got the sensationalizing material and frightening gory detail of heinous crime are being presented repeatedly for the TRP battle, which adds to the problem.

In the case of Aftab-Shraddha the communal twist not only shows the rising tide of divisive politics in India but also it tends to hide the real problem of violence in such alliances. Prominent rights worker Kavita Krishnan points out “The issue is not men from one community being abusive towards women from another community. Making this the focus simply surpasses the actual cause,”


 Two tweets (translated from Hindi) summarize the propaganda which has been instilled into the social understanding. The first one by BJP’s Kapil Mishra states, “Bollywood, media, ads that promote false constructs like brotherhood, politics that is soaked in the blood of daughters, rich and upper middle classes drinking the poison of fake secularism, the sold police and the jihadi education model. Don’t blame daughters for murders like Shraddha.”

This second one is by one Tapan Das: “The biggest weakness is that we have not been able to keep our sisters and daughters within our grasp. They are left free to do what they want. If parents and brothers keep an eye on each and every sister’s/daughter’s movements, then I do not think anyone else will fall in love so soon. They will be caught in the net.” This shows patriarchal angle very prominently,

This is just a sample from what is circulating in the social media with all its negative impact and not only intensifying the prevalent hate but at the same time eclipsing the basic issue related to violence against women more particularly those in interfaith and inter-caste relationships.
The term ‘love jihad’ is a very clever signal for an alleged conversion conspiracy. The projected purposes are presented as recruitment into Islamic terror groups, sex trafficking and changing India’s demography.

Love Jihad, the construct floated by communal forces has been popularized in large sections of society by communal organizations. Conceptually, this love Jihad does not believe in the agency of women and girls being capable of taking their own decisions. This is part of the patriarchal ideology of religious nationalism. Ministers and leaders who are upholding the Hindutva politics are now promising new laws for ‘protecting Hindu girls’. Unfortunately even the Supreme Court Judges are directing the Government to do something about preventing conversions.


Love Jihad bogey was floated few years ago from Kerala. The propaganda was that it aims at conversion to Islam, using non-Muslim girls as ‘sex slaves’ and to incorporate them in terror networks in Syria, Afghanistan etc. The case of Hadiya, Akeela Arunan, marrying Shafik Jahan and converting into Islam showed how this propaganda is totally wrong. She was supposed to be a victim of love jihad, and part of plan to recruit for ISIS. Hadiya stuck to her choices of her partner and religion right up to Supreme Court (SC).  SC dismissed the charges of state authorities as totally false. It was relieving that the Supreme Court gave a verdict [in 2018] upholding the right of Hadiya to marry outside religion. Generally the love jihad bogey is a constructed one all over the country.

In recent months, Karnataka, Assam, Haryana, Gujarat, all ruled by the BJP by itself or in coalition, have promised laws to curb ‘love jihad’; Uttarakhand, Himachal Pradesh, and in recent weeks, Uttar Pradesh and Madhya Pradesh, have already passed laws that criminalize conversion by marriage.
Continue Reading
Click to comment

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *